一级毛片免费不卡在线视频,国产日批视频免费在线观看,菠萝菠萝蜜在线视频免费视频,欧美日韩亚洲无线码在线观看,久久精品这里精品,国产成人综合手机在线播放,色噜噜狠狠狠综合曰曰曰,琪琪视频

法律類(lèi)文章:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

時(shí)間:2023-05-04 17:45:46 考研英語(yǔ) 我要投稿
  • 相關(guān)推薦

法律類(lèi)文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

7 A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

法律類(lèi)文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

  Behind the brewing war over protecting patients' records in an age of HMOs and online medicine.

  Technology is a two-edged sword. Rarely is this as clear as it is in the realm of health care. Technology allows doctors to test their patients for genetic defects--and then to turn around and spread the results throughout the world via the Internet. For someone in need of treatment, that's good news. But for someone in search of a job or an insurance policy, the tidings can be all bad.

  Last week President Bill Clinton proposed a corollary to the patients' bill of rights now before Congress: a right to medical privacy. Beginning in 2002, under rules set to become law in February, patients would be able to stipulate the conditions under which their personal medical data could be divulged. They would be able to examine their records and make corrections. They could learn who else had seen the information. Improper use of records by a caregiver or insurer could result in both civil and criminal penalties. The plan was, said Clinton, "an unprecedented step toward putting Americans back in control of their own medical records."

  While the administration billed the rules as an attempt to strike a balance between the needs of consumers and those of the health-care industry, neither doctors nor insurance companies were happy. The doctors said the rules could actually erode privacy, pointing to a provision allowing managed-care plans to use personal information without consent if the purpose was "health-care operations." That, physicians said, was a loophole through which HMOs and other insurers could pry into the doctor-patient relationship, in the name of assessing the quality of care. Meanwhile, the insurers protested that the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. They were especially disturbed by a provision holding them liable for privacy breaches by "busines

《法律類(lèi)文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY.doc》
将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便收藏和打印
推荐度:
点击下载文档

【法律類(lèi)文章:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY】相關(guān)文章:

Privacy of Famous People06-05

To be,or not to be,that is the question:的翻譯05-02

如何撰寫(xiě)教育教學(xué)類(lèi)文章04-28

怎樣撰寫(xiě)“解題指導(dǎo)”類(lèi)的文章04-30

法律類(lèi)社會(huì)實(shí)踐報(bào)告12-10

學(xué)會(huì)用法律保護(hù)自己文章12-30

淺談生活情感類(lèi)文章的技巧指導(dǎo)05-01

自然科學(xué)類(lèi)文章閱讀淺談04-30

介紹我的法律類(lèi)自學(xué)考試經(jīng)驗(yàn)04-29

作文 議論類(lèi)的文章應(yīng)當(dāng)以論點(diǎn)為宜04-24

法律類(lèi)文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

7 A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

法律類(lèi)文章精選:A QUESTION OF PRIVACY

  Behind the brewing war over protecting patients' records in an age of HMOs and online medicine.

  Technology is a two-edged sword. Rarely is this as clear as it is in the realm of health care. Technology allows doctors to test their patients for genetic defects--and then to turn around and spread the results throughout the world via the Internet. For someone in need of treatment, that's good news. But for someone in search of a job or an insurance policy, the tidings can be all bad.

  Last week President Bill Clinton proposed a corollary to the patients' bill of rights now before Congress: a right to medical privacy. Beginning in 2002, under rules set to become law in February, patients would be able to stipulate the conditions under which their personal medical data could be divulged. They would be able to examine their records and make corrections. They could learn who else had seen the information. Improper use of records by a caregiver or insurer could result in both civil and criminal penalties. The plan was, said Clinton, "an unprecedented step toward putting Americans back in control of their own medical records."

  While the administration billed the rules as an attempt to strike a balance between the needs of consumers and those of the health-care industry, neither doctors nor insurance companies were happy. The doctors said the rules could actually erode privacy, pointing to a provision allowing managed-care plans to use personal information without consent if the purpose was "health-care operations." That, physicians said, was a loophole through which HMOs and other insurers could pry into the doctor-patient relationship, in the name of assessing the quality of care. Meanwhile, the insurers protested that the rules would make them vulnerable to lawsuits. They were especially disturbed by a provision holding them liable for privacy breaches by "busines